पन्ना के इतिहास
18 जनवरी 2016
17 नवंबर 2013
17 अगस्त 2013
7 अगस्त 2013
29 मार्च 2013
18 जून 2012
17 जून 2012
29 सितंबर 2011
11 सितंबर 2011
26 मई 2011
15 अप्रैल 2010
27 जनवरी 2010
25 जनवरी 2010
per previous. restoration was presumably an edit conflict mistake
work on turning this into a master template
The inclusion criteria of lists of notable persons is already defined on Wikipedia - blue linked articles only, see WP:Lists of people
moved Template:Famous players to Template:Famous: generaliseछो
5 जनवरी 2010
7 दिसंबर 2009
rv - you haven't made a suggestion on the talk page. What I changed it to was suggested and agreed upon on the talk page already.
rewording failed to heed convewntion for cleanup template layout. try a simpler one, based on talk suggestion
6 दिसंबर 2009
5 दिसंबर 2009
Adding back, this is not unneeded. It specifically calls out the need to only include verifiable information.
18 नवंबर 2009
15 अक्टूबर 2009
14 अक्टूबर 2009
26 मई 2009
Untrue: there is a policy. The relevant policy, WP:V, is linked and says that that which is not verifiable should be deleted.
final attempt to illustrate the obvious
Asserting that it is useful does not make it so: take it to talk and suggest how a rejected proposal is useful
it is usefull, and there is no consensus, that is the whole point
It does do harm: editors will not pay attention to a template that recommends something that has been rejected. Implies that the poster of the template supports the proposal despite consensus.
Undid revision 292417615 by Kevin McE (talk) does no harm to link it#
del reference to failed and inactive proposal
4 मई 2009
22 मार्च 2009
11 अक्टूबर 2008
make this a bit more concise, and bold the whole problem
Undid revision 244479971 by Kevin McE (talk) it's 2 v 2, if you disagree, get a third opinion, or I will put it up for deletion
If you think so, raise it at the talk page: existing wording unchallenged for 6 weeks +, and was discussed there.
10 अक्टूबर 2008
Undid revision 244451044 by Kevin McE (talk) no, this statement is a violation of WP:POINT, and not standard template language
Reverted to revision 234553944 by Fasach Nua; WP policy is that that which is not verifiable should be deleted. There has been considerable discussionon this (see talk), so edit without reference to it is reverteछो
There is no justification for deleting such sections, you should encourage that they're improved
27 अगस्त 2008
Undid revision 234550042 by Wiggy! (talk)
You're building a POV into the template. Don't assume the conclusion, just let it properly play out in discussion and the development of a consensus.