विकिपीडिया:Non-free content criteria: रिवीजन सभ के बीचा में अंतर
Content deleted Content added
Take it to the talk page, rationales are far more than just having a template on the file description page |
→Policy{{anchor|Policy-2}}: change "3 (no title)" to "3 Minimal usage:" and "3a Minimal usage." to "3a Minimal number of items". Blank for 3 looked awkward, new title for 3a better matches prose: "Multiple items of non-free content are not used..." |
||
लाइन 19:
# {{/span|1}}'''No free equivalent.''' Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose. Where possible, non-free content is transformed into free material instead of using a fair-use defense, or replaced with a freer alternative if one of acceptable quality is available; "acceptable quality" means a quality sufficient to serve the encyclopedic purpose. (As a quick test, before adding non-free content requiring a rationale, ask yourself: "Can this non-free content be replaced by a free version that has the same effect?" and "Could the subject be adequately conveyed by properly sourced text without using the non-free content at all?" If the answer to either is yes, the non-free content probably does not meet this criterion.)
# {{/span|2}}'''Respect for commercial opportunities.''' Non-free content is not used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media.
# {{/span|3}}'''Minimal usage:'''<ol type="a" style="list-style-type:lower-alpha"><li>{{/span|3a}}'''Minimal
# {{/span|4}}'''Previous publication.''' Non-free content must have been published or publicly displayed outside Wikipedia.
# {{/span|5}}'''Content.''' Non-free content meets general Wikipedia content standards and is encyclopedic.
| |||