"टेम्पलेट:Verifiability" की अवतरण में अंतर

कौनों संपादन सारांश नइखे
(Re-add text removed in 2006 when "bold" editor blindly copy-pasted stuff from the POV template (please shorten this))
| subst = <includeonly>{{subst:</includeonly><includeonly>substcheck}}</includeonly>
| type = content
| issue = '''The [[WP:V|verifiability]] of all or some of the sources used in this article is disputed.''' Articles should contain only material that has been published by reputable sources. Editors adding new material to an article should cite a reputable sourcecredible, orthird-party itsources may be removed by any editor. The obligation to providewith a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material, not on thosereputation seekingfor tofact-checking removeand itaccuracy.
| fix = Articles should rely on credible, third-party sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. For academic subjects, the sources should preferably be peer-reviewed. Sources should also be appropriate to the claims made: outlandish claims beg strong sources. The burden of evidence lies with the editors who have made an edit or wish an edit to remain. Editors should therefore provide references. If an articlea topic has no reputable, reliable, third-party sources, Wikipedia should not have an article onabout that topicit. Relevant discussion may be found on the [[:{{NAMESPACE}} talk:{{PAGENAME}}|talk page]].
| date = {{{date|}}}
| cat = Articles lacking sources
नामालूम प्रयोगकर्ता